Image: Bobbi Bowers via Flickr
|
Since its
first issue was published in 1967, Rolling Stone Magazine has been a leading force in
investigative journalism paired with articles about music, entertainment, and
counterculture. As the music industry has changed immensely since rock and
roll’s heyday (also arguably Rolling Stone’s most notable era as a cultural
icon in its own right), the publication has evolved as well, though still
permeates media with oft-controversial articles and features.
In the
aftermath of the tragic 2013 Boston Marathon bombings, Rolling Stone, like hundreds of other media
outlets, published an article about alleged young terrorist Dzhokhar Tsarnaev,
which has sparked unbelievable controversy. The magazine featured an article
called “The Bomber: How a Popular, Promising Student Was Failed by His Family,
Fell Into Radical Islam, and Became a Monster,” paired with a self-taken
portrait of Tsarnaev donning a t-shirt, tousled hair, and a relaxed expression.
Within moments of the magazine cover popping up on Rolling Stone’s website, the Internet was buzzing
with commentary, much of it outraged and impassioned.
Rolling
Stone is no
stranger to controversy. From its earliest days the publication has featured
fearless writing from the infamous Hunter S. Thompson, articles about drugs,
sex, and counterculture, the darker side of musicians, death and suicide; even
murderers have graced its cover. Magazine subscribers and those unfamiliar with
its normal content were appalled by the cover photo, which many say
“glamorizes” Tsarnaev, when the victims should be receiving fame. Boston
residents and even the city’s mayor, Thomas Menino, wrote to the magazine to
show their disapproval, and thousands of people urged others to boycott the
magazine for its obvious attempt to make a profit from a tragedy.
Image: Vegabondblogger via Flickr |
Rolling
Stone has stood
by the article, written by contributing editor Janet Reitman, as well as the
cover photo, which boycotters seemed to forget made the front page of The
New York Times
and countless other publications. The magazine has made statements about their
ongoing commitment to reporting on the most important contemporary issues and
publishing compelling articles, and despite a push to boycott the magazine, Rolling
Stone’s sales for
the issue featuring Tsarnaev have more than doubled.
Is
alleged terrorist Dzhokhar Tsarnaev simply another figure that is as important
to write about as John Lennon, Charles Manson, or Snooki, three other notable
cover stories that Rolling Stone has featured? How do you weigh in on the controversial
cover?
No comments:
Post a Comment